27 March 2026

Free For All Friday No. 907 by Eve

Planning as a Tool vs. Planning as a Hobby

Now that I’m three months into my “One Year, One Planner” challenge, I’m beginning to see a clearer distinction between planning as a tool and planning as a hobby. It turns out that understanding this difference has been one of the most important parts of sticking with one system up until now.

For years, the two were so intertwined in my head that I didn’t really see them as separate. My planner was both the way I organized my life and the way I engaged with a hobby I enjoyed. This year however, I’m noticing how different these two planner identities actually are, and how mixing them together has kept me in some unhelpful (and expensive!) patterns.

Here’s what I’m learning:

1. Planning as a tool feels steady, while planning as a hobby has lead me to restlessness

A planning tool is predictable; it thrives on repetition, routine, and consistency. But a planning hobby likes novelty, change, exploration, and experimentation.

When those two collide, it’s easy to think, “I need a new planner because something feels off.”

But now that switching is off the table for me, I can tell that the “off” feeling is usually the hobby side causing me FOMO, rather than a flaw in the actual tool itself. 

2. The tool supports my life while the hobby became more about dopamine hits

My planner has been essential for running my day for literally decades. Those pages are where I can find my tasks, priorities, reminders, deadlines, decisions and be reminded of my mission and goals. But the hobby piece was about something completely different - testing different sizes, comparing layouts, reviewing inserts, fiddling with structure, making content for social media, etc.

Both served a purpose but only one is required for me to actually function.

3. The hobby demands change! Whereas the tool thrives on consistency

It’s almost funny how opposite they are. The hobby says, “Let’s try something new! The tool says, “Just shut up and use me every day already.”

The more I stick with the same planner, the more I realize how much smoother my days run when I’m not tearing down my system and rebuilding it constantly for the sake of novelty.

4. Separating the tool from the hobby has made me a better planner

I’m no longer letting hobby-impulses dictate my planning decisions. If something feels off, I don’t automatically assume the planner needs to change. Instead, I ask myself better questions like, "Am I craving change for the sake of change?", "Am I bored in some other area of my life?", "Is it really my panner that feels off, or is it ME?"

5. My planner works better now that I’m not constantly “auditioning” alternatives.

There is something almost magical about committing to one system and just...letting go. A planner really does become more powerful the longer you use it. For me, it has. helped me to stop fighting the format and use it more fluidly.

Three months into this challenge, I’m discovering that planning as a tool is more peaceful and grounding than I ever expected, and planning as a hobby can still exist, just in a healthier, more sustainable way

The year is still young!! Are you still in the planner you started the year with?

As always on Friday, feel free to discuss anything ring planner related.

4 comments:

  1. Good observation...

    There is a whole industry based around planner churn; so many YouTube channels, promising "this planner method will change your life", or 'why this new/old binder is the best ever' Those outlets must keep producing new ideas to create new 'content', even if it's just a 'planner flip' or 'moving into this season binder'…

    Even though I have designed my own diary and other inserts, I don't really make good use of them for planning (I've never been a good life planner, and am never likely to be). And my growing collection of binders is about the dopamine hit of collecting nice objects; I do stick with just one binder for actual (limited) planning use: an old P5KL 4-ring Pocket. The insert creation started with manuals, that I _do_ use, but has become a creative outlet, both in the content and layout, and the tools to create them. I do find myself looking for new inserts to design (even having already recreated all the classic 1980s Filofax inserts), even if I am unlikely to use them; my form of 'artwork'... Other people decorate their binders with all sorts of stuff that I find unnecessary, but I should acknowledge that is _their_ creative outlet, and mine is no 'better', just different...

    And yes, Philofaxy is part of the churn...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I’m okay with planning as a hobby and planning as a tool being two distinct things.

    I am decent at sticking to a planner for a year as a tool, I’m in A5 and my inserts are printed for the year and it’s working. So so don’t plan to change it.

    But I am very much enjoying the ideation in thinking about next year. The videos are fun for new ideas and ways of working. I enjoy them.

    I also crochet as a hobby, I know that planning projects is way more fun than actually making it. So I have more yarn than time to make stuff as the planning is just much more fun than the hard slog of row after row of grafting to get it done.

    So planning as a hobby goes through my hobby filter;
    - do I enjoy it and feel better for it?
    - do I have space?
    - can I afford it?
    - is my hubby supportive? (“Another blooming Filofax….”)
    If the answer is yes then why not…

    ReplyDelete
  3. On a different topic, a r/filofax post in the last couple of days asked "what do you think about Filofax moving to most models having removable rings (following the Camden)?" This is publicised in the 2026 catalogue. Finsbury, Norfolk, Lockwood, Malden & the synthetics.

    I confess that, altohugh I had spotted the removable rings, I hadn't noticed that the change was so widespread when Steve published the catalogue, but then I don't really pay much attention to current Filofax products; more just noting the models in my spreadsheet.

    The change is being phased in for older models tihs year. It seems a pretty major change to me. Whilst I can see some advantages for the user (allowing binders to be used for ring or bound journal use, etc), it does seem a bit 'dumbing down'. Maybe it's a way of dealing with their poor quality rings; the plastic sheet will probably last as long as cheap rings, and can be easily replaced...

    https://philofaxy.blogspot.com/2026/01/2026-filofax-global-catalogue.html

    ReplyDelete