Photo by Seaview N. on Unsplash |
The thickness of the paper in your binder makes a big difference in the weight, bulk, and number of pages the rings can hold.
In the past, Filofax brand inserts were 70 gsm. A few years ago they increased to 80 gsm to make them more fountain pen friendly.
Some planner brands use paper that is 100 gsm or even 120 gsm, to prevent show through and bleed through of inks.
Paper doesn't have to be super-thick to prevent inks bleeding through. Tomoe river paper and other similar papers are very thin, but are specially treated to prevent ink bleed-through. The thinness of the paper allows a ring binder to hold more pages. However, if you print your own pages, very thin paper can be problematic when going through a printer.
What thickness of paper do you prefer? Do you like thin paper for reduced bulk? Do you like thick paper for better ink performance? Or do you like something in the middle?
As always on Fridays, feel free to ask and/ or discuss anything ring binder organiser related!
Thanks very much again to Paul for this fourteenth instalment of his wonderful guest post series.
You can find all of the 'Filohax' posts here.
Second of my recent purchases is the Gloucester.
First a bit of back story.
Since reconnecting with my Filofax past, I've made it known in my friends and contacts circles that I am 'Mr Filofax', and this had bagged me an unwanted Personal Pimlico from my friend network. However, I hit the big time when a contact of a contact had an old unused and unwanted Filofax. Several very poor photos were emailed which gave nothing away, until I asked for a photo of any serial number visible on an inside cover. When I saw the serial number '6CL 7/8' I knew I had hit pay dirt, and I'm too embarrassed to say how low a fee I paid (let's just say I hit the 'bullseye' ).
I realised I had a few more bonus' once I received it; the first was its almost pristine condition (save for a slight scuff on the bottom of the front cover), but the real one was realising I had purchased the working binder of a Filofax trainer from the mid 1980's, as it contained a 44 page 'Filofax Retail staff development course' punched course notes, again in mint condition. I had a bit of a chat with the now 80 year old ex trainer, but he could only recall delivering this training in high end London stores such as John Lewis and Harrods to sell 'to the yuppies '!... well it was 40 years ago!).
Its condition was as to be expected for a binder used for a short period in the 1980's, and then stored flat in a drawer for nearly 40 years - clean-ish but dry and quite poor flatability.
After cleaning and feeding the leather it's looking as good as new, and the rings are as good as if purchased yesterday (well, maybe not yesterday if quality standards these days are anything to go by!)
As with my other recent purchase, the Argyll, the Gloucester doesn't have ring protectors and as a consequence, I've come to appreciate the aesthetic qualities of the 'ring impressions' this lack leaves in the leather. Due to the Gloucester's lack of use this isn't yet showing, but as I've moved my work inserts into the Gloucester I'm hoping that these will break in soon as I love the 'lived in look' of vintage Filofax. One major benefit I'm finding from using it for work is its lack of fastener - I use a man bag and can be pulling the Filofax in and out of it 30 times a day, so now there is no fastener to snag on the bag.
The other benefit of these 'clean lines' is the lack of a pen loop - ordinarily this would pose a problem, but as I use a pen loop WITHIN the 7/8 rings there is nothing to snag on the bag as I retrieve it. A real benefit for using the Gloucester for work. I also love the authentic quality of the leather - it just feels like calf hide cut to shape and dyed, that's it, no padding or stiffening giving a very straightforward feeling.
Do any Gloucester owners have any insights or stories to tell?
It has been a while since we have been able to feature a new catalogue on Philofaxy. I came across this one on a site here in Europe.
It's the global catalogue for Filofax most probably published late last year.
You will find our full catalogue collection here.
The content of all these catalogue posts are the intellectual property of Filofax Group Ltd. They are reproduced on Philofaxy with their full permission for research and educational purposes only.Whilst looking back through some of the posts here for inspiration, I realised that it's been ten years since I first purchased my beloved personal Kensington! However, it hasn't been in my possession for all that time as I sold it some years ago, so it's also belonged to three different members of the community in the US, before finally coming back to its forever home with me in 2020.
To celebrate my love of all things Kensington, here are some of my posts:
Filofax Kensington review - By Anita - my initial post back in 2014.
The Goldilocks effect (home in my Kensington - very kindly gifted back to me in 2016.
There and Back Again: a Kensington's Tale - by Anita - gifted back to me again in 2020! I am so appreciative of our wonderful and generous community.
Personal Kensington flip through - by Anita
After it was so kindly gifted back to me in 2016, I gave it back again to the same person as I'd decided that I'd wanted to own only the one Filofax, and I felt at that time that I needed something more colourful. And then I reached out to them again on the off-chance that they might still have it in 2020... and it's been with me ever since. It does seem a bit silly now, but in the past I've pushed myself to own just the one binder, which means that I have rehomed some that I probably wouldn't now. However, I have enjoyed this journey, so I don't have any regrets about the others and have my all-time favourite back.
Do you have any organisers that you have gotten back again due to seller's regret, or re-purchased one again at a later date?
And as always on Fridays, please feel free to discuss anything organiser related. I hope that you have a great weekend.
Thanks very much again to Paul for this thirteenth instalment of his wonderful guest post series.
You can find all of the 'Filohax' posts here.
This was a snap eBay purchase, after seeing it in an auction but with a very reasonable 'or buy now' price, which I quickly secured. I always try to find out my new purchases' history and this one was purchased in probably 1995 as a present for the then deputy headmaster of a secondary school. It arrived with me with Filofax printer paper (but no software) as the owner used to print off a shared diary.
The binder had sat in a drawer since the mid 2000s, so my first impression on unpacking it was that it was a bit dowdy and quite dry looking. After addressing this, I realised that the down at heel looking two pocketed Filofax was in fact a very attractive patinaed Argyll (according to Filowiki an Argyll is a two pocket Filofax made of Calf leather). The first C of the C2CLF 7/8 designation apparently stands for 'custom', although I'm not sure in what way it was customised?
The binder had obviously been well used as it has perfect flatability, and as this model doesn't have ring protectors their impressions are clearly visible on the front cover. I never thought I would say this, but I prefer my new Argyll even more than my trusty Winchesters - specifically due to this feature. There's something very attractive to me in being able to see the impressions of the rings through the leather, I think it's a 'form following function' thing.
One thing that nearly made me pass on the purchase was its burgundy colour. I've never liked the look of burgundy binders in photographs, but there was something about this binder's patina that made me take a chance (that and it was going for a 'bobby' - cockney slang), but after its clean, feed and polish its well worn and darkened from use leather has really opened my mind to this colour, it's very 'vintage'! Also, it has the advantage of having its fastener popper missing - my personal preference, as it contributes to the lived in look I like.
It's only a very minor criticism of this model, but at 9mm taller than the Winchester model, its profile is slightly too 'upright' looking for my liking! This is made up for however in spades by its fabulously textured calf leather, accentuated by the prominent ring impressions which imbue it with a well loved character.
The limit of just two pockets would limit its use to me as an EDC (I need pockets with ring protectors, or better still zips to contain the random items I carry in mine, but as I will be putting it to work housing one of the four chapters in my 'whole life in a Filofax' project, this won't matter).
All in all this is a quintessential English made Filofax which exudes vintage charm.
La Rentree happens next week here in France. This is when all school children return on Monday and also a lot of businesses will be reopening after their summer breaks. It's like a return to normal for us.
As usual for me I've not managed to do as much as I would have liked to get done through the summer holidays. Various excuses/reasons, the weather... too hot or too wet (June/July) but if the weather stays fine during September I should be able to catch up!
What do you have in your To-Do list at this time of year. Have you got your inserts for 2025 printed yet?
As usual it is Friday so please feel free to discuss anything Filofax related.
Keen eyed US readers may recently have spotted that some unusual format binders from Plotter were on offer at the San Francisco pen show.
One was the Mini 5 Square format (which, for some, would warrant a dedicated discussion), but the one that really caught my eye was their 3-Ring format.
Both of these have been available in Japan for some time, but are little known elsewhere. I’d spotted the 3-Ring offering a while ago and fell instantly in love!
Here is a photo comparing the 3-Ring to the Mini 5 (left):
Three-ring formats have been around for a while – Filofax have the M2, which is discontinued but still supported for refills. Lefax also had a model called Soho (sadly long obsolete), which used a half-size personal paper.
Filofax today produce mini jot pads, which are of a similar size too.
The beauty of these three-ringed leaves is that they can fit into many of the other ring-bound formats.
For the Plotter models, the dedicated leaves are a “business card” size. Rhodia also offer lovely, punched refills in Japan that are still a perfect fit, but provide some extra writing space. They match the width of Filofax personal size, which appeals to me.
These five sizes are compared below (clockwise from top left Lefax Soho, Rhodia Organizer, Plotter Card Size, Filofax Mini Jot Pad, Filofax M2.):
Plotter and Rhodia pads:
Here’s the Plotter 3-Ring alongside a Filofax M2.
This particular 3-Ring binder is made of Liscio (“tanned, oil-smooth authentic Italian”) leather, nominally blue but actually green in appearance. It has 11mm silver Krause rings and a pink gold backplate. I think it was a limited edition, which came with a matching “ring supporter” to help prevent indentations from the rings. The design is very minimalist, but you can purchase a leather card holder insert to provide a pocket if desired.
I’m currently finding the combination of a Plotter 3-Ring with a personal size binder is hard to beat.
Thank you Max for sharing the details of this binder with us and our readers.